What is Solana?
Solana bets that one very fast chain beats a stack of layers. Here is how it is built, what a transaction costs and what that speed asks of its validators.
Logos are trademarks of their respective owners, shown for identification only. Their use does not imply endorsement. Licences.

On this page
- What kind of blockchain is Solana?
- What is proof of history, and why does Solana need it?
- How does Solana run transactions in parallel?
- How much does a Solana transaction cost?
- How does Solana compare with Ethereum?
- What does Solana trade away for speed?
- What mistakes do beginners make with Solana?
- Questions readers ask
- Sources
- Solana is a layer 1 blockchain that runs proof-of-stake consensus and adds a clock called proof of history to order transactions.
- Its runtime, Sealevel, can run transactions in parallel because each transaction lists in advance which accounts it will read or write.
- Every signature pays a base fee of 5,000 lamports, half burned and half paid to the validator; 1 SOL equals one billion lamports.
- The design asks a lot of validators: Agave's documentation calls for 256 GB of RAM or more, far above Ethereum's node minimum.
- Solana smart contracts are called programs; they are usually written in Rust and can stay upgradeable unless their upgrade authority is removed.
Solana is a proof-of-stake layer 1 blockchain designed for high throughput and low fees. It orders transactions with a cryptographic clock called proof of history and runs non-conflicting transactions in parallel. Its native coin, SOL, pays fees and is staked by the validators that produce blocks.
What kind of blockchain is Solana?
Solana is a layer 1: an independent blockchain with its own validators, its own consensus and its own coin, SOL. It does not settle to another chain. Like Ethereum, it runs smart contracts, so people use it for tokens, trading apps and payments. Unlike Ethereum, whose scaling plan centres on layer 2 networks, Solana is designed to handle activity on the base chain itself.
Security comes from proof of stake. Validators lock up SOL, and Solana's documentation defines stake as tokens forfeited to the network if malicious validator behaviour can be proven. A rotating leader schedule decides which validator produces the block in each time slot.
What is proof of history, and why does Solana need it?
Computers spread around the world disagree slightly about the time. Most blockchains spend messages and waiting time settling on an order of events. Solana's whitepaper, written by Anatoly Yakovenko, proposes a shortcut it calls proof of history.
The idea is a running chain of hashes. A validator repeatedly hashes the previous output, so each result can only be produced after the one before it. When a transaction is mixed into that chain, the next hash proves the transaction existed before that point. Anyone can later re-run the sequence and confirm both the order and that time passed between entries.
Proof of history is not a consensus mechanism on its own. The whitepaper pairs it with proof of stake: the leader produces the sequence, and other validators vote to confirm it. A shared clock means validators spend less effort agreeing on order, which is part of how Solana keeps its slots short — roughly 400 milliseconds each, according to its documentation.

How does Solana run transactions in parallel?
On many blockchains, transactions are executed one after another. Solana's runtime, which its documentation calls Sealevel, can run them side by side. This works because every Solana transaction must declare up front every account it will touch and whether it will only read it or also write to it.
If two transactions write to different accounts — say, two strangers each paying someone else — they cannot interfere, so the validator can process both at once. If they write to the same account, they are queued. Programs themselves are stateless: the code lives in one account and the data it changes lives in separate data accounts passed in with each instruction.
A transaction bundles one or more instructions. Solana's docs say they are atomic: either all instructions succeed or all are reversed — and the fee is still charged if the transaction fails. A transaction must also reference a recent block hash, which stays valid for 150 slots, about a minute.
How much does a Solana transaction cost?
Fees are counted in lamports, Solana's smallest unit: one lamport is 0.000000001 SOL. Every transaction pays a base fee of 5,000 lamports per signature. Half of that base fee is burned and half goes to the validator that processed it. Users can add an optional prioritization fee to move ahead in busy periods; it is calculated from a price per compute unit (measured in micro-lamports) times the compute units the transaction requests, and goes entirely to the validator.
How does Solana compare with Ethereum?
| Feature | Solana | Ethereum |
|---|---|---|
| Scaling approach | One fast base chain | Base chain plus rollups on top |
| Smart contracts | “Programs”, stateless, mostly written in Rust | Contracts hold code and data together; Solidity or Vyper |
| Execution | Parallel where accounts do not overlap (Sealevel) | One shared virtual machine, the EVM |
| Smallest fee unit | Lamport (0.000000001 SOL) | Gwei (0.000000001 ETH) |
| Node hardware (documented) | Validator: 256 GB RAM or more, 12+ CPU cores | Full node minimum: 16 GB RAM, 2+ cores |
Because its programs do not run on the Ethereum Virtual Machine, Solana is not EVM-compatible: Ethereum contracts and wallets do not carry over directly.
What does Solana trade away for speed?
Speed has a price in hardware. Agave, a Solana validator client maintained by Anza, lists 12 cores or more, 256 GB of RAM or more, multiple fast NVMe drives and at least a 2 Gbit/s connection for a staked validator. Ethereum's documentation puts a full node's minimum at 16 GB of RAM. Fewer people can afford Solana-class machines, which is the heart of the blockchain trilemma.
The Bank for International Settlements made this point in 2022, arguing that newer layer 1s such as Solana gain capacity at the cost of greater centralisation and weaker security. That is the BIS's assessment; others weigh the trade-off differently, so treat it as a design choice to understand rather than a settled verdict.
What mistakes do beginners make with Solana?
- Quoting the whitepaper's 710,000 transactions per second as real. The whitepaper presents it as a theoretical ceiling on a 1 gigabit network, not measured performance.
- Assuming a failed transaction is free. Solana charges the fee even when a transaction reverts.
- Ignoring upgrade keys. A program deployed with the upgradeable loader can be changed by whoever holds its upgrade authority; it becomes immutable only when that authority is revoked.
- Mixing up networks. A Solana address is not an Ethereum address. Sending tokens to the wrong chain format can mean losing them — check the address and network first.
Questions readers ask
Is Solana a layer 2?
No. Solana is a layer 1 with its own validators and proof-of-stake consensus; it does not settle to Ethereum or Bitcoin.
What is a lamport?
The smallest unit of SOL, equal to 0.000000001 SOL. Solana fees are quoted in lamports; 1 SOL is one billion lamports.
Is proof of history the same as proof of stake?
No. Proof of history is a verifiable clock that orders events. Proof of stake is how validators are chosen and penalised. Solana uses both together.
Can I use MetaMask-style Ethereum tools on Solana?
Not directly. Solana programs run on their own runtime rather than the EVM, so it uses its own wallets, address format and developer tools.
Solana is a single, fast layer 1 that orders transactions with proof of history and runs them in parallel where it can. That design keeps fees tiny in lamport terms, but it asks validators for powerful hardware — a real trade-off, not a free lunch. Judge it on that trade-off rather than on headline throughput numbers.
Sources
- Anatoly Yakovenko / Solana, Solana: A new architecture for a high performance blockchain (v0.8.13) (n.d.)Primary source
- Solana documentation, Transaction fees (2026)Primary source
- Solana documentation, Terminology (2026)Primary source
- Solana documentation, Transactions (2026)Primary source
- Solana documentation, Programs (2026)Primary source
- Solana documentation, Accounts (2026)Primary source
- Anza (Agave documentation), Agave validator requirements (2026)Primary source
- ethereum.org (Ethereum Foundation), Spin up your own Ethereum node (2026)Primary source
- ethereum.org (Ethereum Foundation), Gas and fees (2026)Primary source
- Bank for International Settlements, Blockchain scalability and the fragmentation of crypto (BIS Bulletin No 56) (2022)Primary source
Educational content only — not financial, investment, legal or tax advice. Crypto-assets are high-risk and you could lose all the money you put in. Rules differ by country; check with your national regulator. See our risk disclosure and editorial policy.



